Reacties
speedfreak 16 July / 2005 / 17:44

Shame, you won"t be able to kite but it"s ok to keep ruining the planet with toxins and smog from power plants.

 

Fuck off, sign my dick, I think windfarms are the future.

Drive it like it"s stolen!

johndoe 16 July / 2005 / 21:23
No i have to agree with the poster there is enough space up there why put right at the beach ? 

johndoe had een 5 sterren sessie in Kijkduin met maar liefst 16 - 21 knots op zijn Best Bularoo (2010)

Differ 17 July / 2005 / 00:36
.
Van vallen leer je opstaan!!!!

Differ 17 July / 2005 / 00:36
probably because that spot gives highest wind results
Van vallen leer je opstaan!!!!

speedfreak 18 July / 2005 / 11:05

Putting them on the beach or onshore means that the cost of operating them is reduced, no long cables that need to be sunk under the water and easy access for maintaining them. As posted, it looks to be the best spot for wind capture too.

People need to look for long term sustainable power sources, if it means a kite spot disappears in favour of clean power, then bye bye kite spot.

Kiting falls a long way second to keeping earth a nice place to live, what are the alternatives?? Mars, Jupiter or YourAnus?

Drive it like it"s stolen!

Jurrien 18 July / 2005 / 16:30
Your anus_/-\o__/-\o_
---===Kitefabriek IJmuiden===--- Kite reparaties zoals het hoort! facebook.com/kitedokter